Disingenuous European Politicians

European Parliament: Defeated LGBT-Lobby licking its wounds

Posted on | October 22, 2013 

By J.C. von Krempach, J.D.

Turtle Bay and Beyond

 

In the aftermath of their spectacular defeat on the Estrela Report, the homosexualist-abortionist Members of the European Parliament use their internet outlet to inform about their view of the unexpected – and, from their point of view, most undesired – outcome.

What I find particularly remarkable is the following part of their analysis:

“Religious and political conservatives lobbied intensely against this report with outright lies. They wrongly said, for instance, that the report would force Member States to change abortion rules, or include mandatory teaching about masturbation to 0-4 year-olds.”

Well, of course it was clear to everyone that the report, having no legally binding effect, could never force Member States to change abortion rules, or impose mandatory rules about teaching masturbation to 0-4 year olds.

Edite is disappointed

But the reason for the report, had it been adopted, to have no practical impact is precisely that it dealt with matters clearly outside the European Parliament’s competences. At the same time, there is absolutely no doubt that the defeated draft did contain the controversial content. With regard to the child abuse issue (for we have no other name for what the defeated report was proposing), we may refer you to our previous post. With regard to the report’s call to legalize abortion, we refer to the draft itself, in particular its § 34. It is deeply dishonest (and therefore typical for the abortionist-homosexalist lobby) to pretend that this content wasn’t there.

In other words: if the EP had the competence to impose abortion, abolish the freedom of conscience for health professionals, or provide for compulsory child abuse, the authors and supporters of the draft would certainly not have hesitated to use that power.

The sore reaction of Michael “Blitzkrieg” Cashman, Caecilia Wikstrom, and Ulrike Lunacek, the homosexualist ring-leaders, shows once again the persistent and deeply entrenched disingenuity of their argument. What they seem to say is: “vote for our report, because it will have no practical consequences”. The lack of sincerity in this statement must be self-evident to all but the most narrow-minded ideologues. The LGBT-lobby is hereby declaring itself guilty of misusing the Parliament.

Cashman: "Blitzkrieg" ended with defeat

Which makes me wonder: do “mainstream” politicians in the European Parliament lend support to the LGBT-abortion nonsense proposed by Cashman, Lunacek and their crowd simply because they think it has no consequences? Would they vote against the same proposals, if they expected those proposals to have a legal effect? That would be quite a relief.

But at the same time it would be an additional reason to question the legitimacy of those non-binding “Initiative Reports”, by which the abortionist-homosexualist lobby continues flooding the Parliament, wasting time and ressources that could be put to better use.