Wellington Meets the Hard-Left
Christchurch used to be New Zealand's most hard-Left city. There were plenty of folk in that metropolis who were heirs of a liberal, works-based Christian tradition. As the generations passed, "works-based" increasingly became a strident demand for government works, with local government being a big ruler, regulator, and funder via taxation, and central government being pressured to co-contribute.
The Christchurch earthquake put paid to much of this. Reality--hard, brute reality--has sunk in and all sort of tradeoffs are now being made in that city. If they had not had to face real life and real human beings and real suffering Christchurch would likely have remained a hard-Left beacon.
Now, the hard-Left in that city has narrowed down to spending most of its time focused upon what do do with the wrecked Christchurch cathedral. There are plenty of hard-Left socialists and fellow travellers who feel that "they" own the cathedral--despite the fact they have never set foot within it while it still existed--and who demand that they have the final say as to what will happen to that ruin. The actual owners, the Anglican Church, have largely been sidelined by the "community"--which is code for those who believe society, aka government, aka taxpayers, need to be stripped of some more money to bring the "community's" plans for the cathedral into reality. The reflexive Leftist assumption of ownership of the cathedral is a classic symptom of the mindset. The demand that "others", in this case the Anglican Church and central government, pay for their demands is also an abiding characteristic.
But now Wellington is probably the most hard-Left city in New Zealand, with Christchurch limping along behind. That city is exhibiting one of the abiding characteristics of hard-Left governance: breakdown, gridlock, and havoc.