Propaganda In All But Name

Speaking the Powers' Truth

It's official.  Sort of.  German state media are really propaganda fronts for the German government.

In the European tradition, along with the US and the vestiges of the British Empire, state run media have long existed.  In virtually all cases they have become mouthpieces for various left-wing causes, consistently framed as what "reasonably minded people believe".  The presumption of rectitude and the assertion that one represents the voice of reasonable men carries great weight and authority.  At least in the minds of those who so presume and assert.

The tight fraternal bonds that exist between left-wing ideology and state media are not difficult to explain.  After all, state owned and state run media (whether print or broadcasting) rely upon public funding.  Their life blood runs along state-funded arteries.  They exist by virtue of presuming the rectitude and necessity of state ownership and state funding.  They are the working organs of left-wing, socialist ideology.  Never bite the hand that feeds.

Recently a state media "elder statesman" in Germany did the unthinkable.
 He publicly acknowledged that state media in Germany regularly frame news stories so as to reflect what the German government would want to see and hear and read.

A retired media boss at a major German state broadcaster has admitted his network and others take orders from the government on what — and what not — to report.

National public service broadcaster Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF), which was recently forced into a humiliating apology for their silence on migrant violence and sex assault is being drawn into a fresh scandal after one of their former bureau chiefs admitted the company takes orders from the government on what it reports. He said journalists received instructions to write news that would be “to Ms. Merkel’s liking”.  [Bloomberg London]

The long held rationale for state funded and state owned media argues that non-state media organisations are necessarily capitalist.  They are owned by the rich and wealthy exploiter class.  There needs to be balance and diversity, so that the voice of the poor and disenfranchised is also heard.  State owned media provide the non-self-interested "balance".  At least that's the theory.  However, we all know that the theory rapidly devolves into speaking up for the worldviews of government paymasters, not the proletariat.

Former head of ZDF Bonn Dr. Wolfgang Herles make the remarks during a radio event (from minute 27) in Berlin where journalists discussed the media landscape. Moving on to the freedom of the press, the panel chair asked Dr. Herles whether things in Germany had got “seriously out of whack”. With an honesty perhaps unusual in Germany, Dr. Herles replied that ordinary Germans were totally losing faith in the media, something he called a “scandal”. He said:

“We have the problem that – now I’m mainly talking about the public [state] media – we have a closeness to the government. Not only because commentary is mainly in line with the grand coalition (CSU, CDU, and SPD), with the spectrum of opinion, but also because we are completely taken in by the agenda laid down by the political class”.

The media in general have a "closeness" to the government; the state media especially so.  They hold and reflect the same preoccupations, concerns, world-views of the "political class".  But in Germany's case it gets worse.  It has got to the stage where the state media are the mouthpiece of the government--a kind of German Pravda.

Worse than the mainstream, government controlled and poll-tax funded media in Germany just agreeing with the ruling coalition, the stations actually took orders on what was and was not to be reported on. He said:  “…the topics about which are reported are laid down by the government.

“There are many topics that would be more important than what the government wants. But they, of course, want to deflect attention away from what doesn’t happen. Yet what doesn’t happen is often more important than what does happen – more important than gesture politics”.

While these orders are sent to media companies from unspecified places in the government, they are communicated to individual journalists by news executives using a new-speak jargon. Dr. Herles explains that while “there are, in fact, instructions from above”, when the editor in chief of ZDF communicated these instructions to his juniors he would merely say reporting should be framed in a way that “serves Europe and the public good”.  There would be no need to add in brackets that this actually means it should be reported “to Ms. Merkel’s liking”, as they would be understood as the true meaning.

This informal, but real, conspiracy has become exposed in the recent ongoing crisis over refugees.  The experience of German citizens is contrary to the propaganda which the government is feeding through its tame media.  There is a yawning credibility gap.  A collective cognitive dissonance.  What Chancellor Merkel is advocating and promoting runs counter to common sense.  Growing numbers of Germans are experiencing the very real clash of cultures and world-views as they experience non-assimilated refugees.  They disbelieve the easy promises of ready assimilation.

“Today, one is not allowed to say anything negative about the refugees” said Dr. Herles, concluding: “This is government journalism and that leads to a situation in which people no longer trust us. This is a scandal.”

There has been very little reporting of the comments in the German media, and what there was has been critical of the remarks. Focus reported the comments of one centre-left media figure, Der Freitag newspaper editor Jakob Augstein who when asked whether there had ever been such “instructions from above”, said: “No, I deny vehemently there has ever been commands from the top”.

When credibility is lost, it is very difficult to regain.  On the other hand, a sceptical public can be a good thing.

That the German mainstream media is not free and routinely obscures or bends the truth has been a key criticism by the Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of Europe (PEGIDA) movement, which has coined phrases like Lügenpresse — the liar press — to express their frustration.

The "liar press".  When state run and influenced media get dubbed the "liar press" we are not too far away from a reincarnation of Pravda.