Christians believe in the God Who is the Cause of all causes. Here is an excerpt from one of the most comprehensive confessions ever made by the Church, written about four hundred years ago:
God from all eternity did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass: yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established. ("Of God's Eternal Decree", Westminster Confession of Faith 3:1)Natural causation exists only because God has ordained and commanded all. But this confession, this aspect of the undoubted Christian faith, has never been understood by materialists and Unbelievers in general.
To them god can ever only be nothing more than a warranting concept, a bucket if you will, to hold all that we don't know and understand about natural causes. As scientific knowledge increases, and our understanding of natural causation grows, the "bucket", and therefore god, shrinks. This is known as the "God of the gaps" theory.
Materialists cling to it like petulant children because the identification of god with all that we are agnostic about is already required by their materialist pseudo-religion. It is the only god their religion allows them to acknowledge. For them it is always "matter versus God". For the Christian it is always "only matter and natural causes because of God". Thus, the dichotomy of matter versus God has only and always been a straw man. When materialists talk of god they always are making reference to an idol--to a god as they have conceived it to be, not to God as He has revealed Himself to be.
Marilynne Robinson reflects on this circumstance.
For almost as long as their has been science in the West there has been a significant strain in scientific thought which assumed that the physical and material preclude the spiritual. The assumption persists amongst us still, vigorous as ever, that if a thing can be "explained," associated with a physical process, it has been excluded from the category of the spiritual. But the "physical" in this sense is only a disappearingly thin slice of being, selected, for our purposes, out of the totality of being by the fact that we perceive it as solid, substantial. We all know that if we were the size of atoms, chairs and tables would appear to us as loose clouds of energy. [Marilynne Robinson, When I Was a Child I Read Books (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012), p. 9f]
Robinson, of course, is making reference to the astounding discoveries over the last century in particle physics. It turns out that matter is not "hard" at all. It is all loose pulsating clouds of energy. We are all loose pulsating clouds of energy. Robinson continues:
It seems to me very amazing that the arbitrarily selected "physical" world we inhabit is coherent and lawful. An older vocabulary would offer the world "miraculous." Knowing what we know now, an earlier generation might see divine providence in the fact of a world coherent enough to be experienced by us as complete in itself, and as a basis upon which all claims to reality can be tested. A truly theological age would see in this divine Providence intent on making human habitation within the wild roar of the cosmos.Given what we now are learning about the cosmos and the natural order, the old dualism between matter and spirit is exploding to pieces. This is not to say that men will cease clinging to it with stubborn ferocity. It is to say, however, that their intractable stubbornness will be increasingly plain. The material realm's testimony to the God who created all things is getting louder and more scintillating as our understanding of the material grows. The chaotic, wild roar of the cosmos makes the plain, the hard, the ordinary, the predictable, and the regular character of the creation appear comprehensively and utterly miraculous.
But almost everyone, for generations now, has insisted on a sharp distinction between the physical and the spiritual. So we have had theologies that really proposed a "God of the gaps" as if God were not manifest in the creation, as the Bible is so inclined to insist, but instead survives in those dark places, those black boxes, where the light of science has not yet shone. And we have atheisms and agnosticisms that make precisely the same argument, only assuming that at some time the light of science will indeed dispel the last shadow in which the holy might have been thought to linger. [Ibid.]
No comments:
Post a Comment