Sex Education in Pagan Schools

 Imagining the World as Predominantly Homosexual

The NZ Herald has been running a "thread" on sex ed in schools.  Some parents have discovered what their children are actually being taught in the government schools and they are angry. 

Schools are being accused of going too far in what they teach children about sex. Children as young as 12 are being taught about oral sex and told it's acceptable to play with a girl's private parts as long as "she's okay with it".

In other cases, 14-year-old girls are being taught how to put condoms on plastic penises, and one female teacher imitated the noises she made during orgasm to her class of 15-year-olds. The often-graphic nature of today's sex education lessons is considered perfectly acceptable, and necessary, by some parents, but many others are shocked and say it has gone too far.

Now the other "side" has weighed in.  The professionals.
  They are citing "international research" to "prove" that sex education in schools can actually reduces teenage sexual activity.  Yup.  And we have research to prove that placebos can cure diseases. 

Good quality and comprehensive education programmes in schools can delay the first time a teenager has sex and reduce risk-taking behaviour, international studies show.  Their findings are backed by Family Planning chief executive Jackie Edmond who said programmes were most effective when they began before a young person first has sex. "Comprehensive sexuality education aims to equip children and young people with the knowledge, skills and values to have safe, fulfilling and enjoyable relationships and to take responsibility for their health and well-being."

"Because sexuality education is much more than 'the birds and the bees' it should start young."

The NZ Herald has also run a bio on a young girl who has fallen pregnant after one of the enlightened sex education sessions in government schools.  She is about to give birth.  She claims that her sex-ed class encouraged her to have sex as long as everyone consented.

A pregnant teenager says sex education in schools does not prevent young people from having sex - if anything, it encourages it.  Amber-Leigh Erasmus is due to give birth to her first child on Saturday, a result of having unprotected sex during New Year celebrations.

The Hibiscus Coast 17-year-old lost her virginity at 14, a year after she was taught about sex at school and the fact it was "okay as long as you consented".

Now sometimes social issues work through society in a kind of pendulum effect.  One generation is permissive; the next is far more strictly moral.  Will sex education in schools follow this effect?  Will it swing back to a more sane position, introducing a moral context which promotes abstinence and sex only within the bounds of marriage?

Unfortunately we do not believe so.  In the first place the edifice of our culture is built upon an established religion of evolutionary materialism.  Human beings are nothing more than biological machines.  Sex is part of the machine function.  Sex education will therefore always focus upon the mechanics of sex.  How it works.  How you do it.  The moving parts.  Whilst evolutionary biologists speculate on morality being a product of evolution its moral codes are nebulous, undefined, and racked with the naturalistic fallacy: what exists is morally right. 

Thus sex education in government schools (which exist to propagate the established religions of our age) will always focus upon sex being an ordinary part of life, a biological function, to be participated in as one participates in eating food, or breathing, or playing sport.  This will not change until our nation repents of its pathetic idolatries and false gods and turns back to the Living God. 

Secondly, it could be argued that government schools and the "sex education lobby" will eventually come to realise that it is far better for parents to ensure their children receive appropriate sex education.  Not a hope.  Why?  Because government schools proceed on the assumption and assertion that parents are incompetent to educate or to arrange for an appropriate education for their children.  They need experts to take over.  Hence New Zealand government education is "free" (a lie), compulsory, and secular. 

So if there is to be no change but only a relentless drive to promote animal-like behaviour as sex-education, what will the government classrooms be promoting in twenty-five years time?  Prostitution will be promoted as a normal part of life and an excellent career for pupils to aspire to.  Prostitutes, now euphemistically referred to as "sex-workers" will be invited to promote their careers to pupils, with explanations of how brothels work, the kinds of sex workers one can employ, how a sex worker goes about his or her work and so forth.  They will also be asked to demonstrate their craft in the classroom.  Teachers will bring their current lovers into the class to demonstrate advanced techniques of foreplay and coitus.  And so on.  All this has actually occurred in reported cases in the United States. 

We are fast following.

The father of a 12-year-old boy is questioning why his son has been taught "all the grubby stuff" about sex, but none of the basics, such as how a baby is made.  The man, who is in his 40s, took his son out of sex education classes last week because of how explicit they had been.

The boy's class had discussed things they could do besides intercourse, and the teacher had suggested oral sex as it "wasn't sex" and "won't inevitably lead to sexual intercourse".  Anal sex was discussed as another option. Students also lay on the floor together with their eyes shut imagining the world was predominantly gay.

Welcome to the wonderful world of Unbelief.