Disgusted at Defence Lawyers
The jury system is an intrinsic component of the English justice system we have inherited. Not all Western countries use it, employing instead the bench trial system where a judge or judges make all the court's decisions. It is an important component of the justice system--part of a rich and blessed heritage derived from the first Christendom.
The decline of the jury system is probably inevitable as our society becomes more pagan, less Christian. Juries are not experts in law. They are lay people. From time to time
they may make errors of judgment. Calls for "professionals"--judges and
lawers--to supersede juries arise. One reason is that, for Unbelievers, justice and judgement in this life is the only justice possible. The idea of the guilty going free and unpunished in this life is hard for Unbelief to bear. People believe that experts should be relied upon to reach safer decisions in a criminal trial. But a fundamental flaw in the bench trial system is that the State ultimately controls the judiciary; far too many states are corrupted by power and money and the implication is that this can easily reach into the judiciary.
Tuesday, 20 November 2012
Monday, 19 November 2012
Unbelief's Finest Century
All in One Little Lifetime: All Gone with the Wind
Justin TaylorJournalist Malcom Muggeridge, writing in 1980:
We look back upon history and what do we see?—Malcom Muggeridge, “But Not of Christ,” Seeing Through the Eye: Malcolm Muggeridge on Faith, ed. Cecil Kuhne (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2005), 29-30.
Empires rising and falling, revolutions and counterrevolutions, wealth accumulating and and then disbursed, one nation dominant and then another. Shakespeare speaks of the “rise and fall of great ones that ebb and flow with the moon.”
In one lifetime I have seen my own countrymen ruling over a quarter of the world, the great majority of them convinced, in the words of what is still a favorite song, that “God who’s made them mighty would make them mightier yet.”
I’ve heard a crazed, cracked Austrian proclaim to the world the establishment of a German Reich that would last for a thousand years; an Italian clown announce he would restart the calendar to begin with his own assumption of power; a murderous Georgian brigand in the Kremlin acclaimed by the intellectual elite of the western world as wiser than Solomon, more enlightened than Asoka, more humane than Marcus Aurelius.
I’ve seen America wealthier and in terms of military weaponry more powerful than all the rest of the world put together, so that Americans, had they so wished, could have outdone an Alexander or a Julius Caesar in the range and scale of their conquests.
All in one little lifetime. All gone with the wind.
England now part of an island off the coast of Europe and threatened with dismemberment and even bankruptcy.
Hitler and Mussolini dead and remembered only in infamy.
Stalin a forbidden name in the regime he helped to found and dominate for some three decades.
America haunted by fears of running out of the precious fluid that keeps the motorways roaring and the smog settling, with troubled memories of a disastrous campaign in Vietnam and of the great victories of the Don Quixotes of the media when they charged the windmills of Watergate. All in one lifetime, all in one lifetime, all gone. Gone with the wind.
When Ravi Zacharias quotes a version of these memorable words from Muggeridge, he often adds his own appropriate postscript:
Behind the debris of these solemn supermen, and self-styled imperial diplomatists, there stands the gigantic figure of one, because of whom, by whom, in whom and through whom alone, mankind may still have peace: The person of Jesus Christ. I present him as the way, the truth, and the life.
Mixed Messages
Inebriation and Rape
The New Zealand police are saying that far too many young women are being raped whilst so intoxicated that they cannot recall who, what, when, or how. These cases, whilst on the balance of probabilities genuine, are very difficult to prosecute successfully. This, from the NZ Herald:
The New Zealand police are saying that far too many young women are being raped whilst so intoxicated that they cannot recall who, what, when, or how. These cases, whilst on the balance of probabilities genuine, are very difficult to prosecute successfully. This, from the NZ Herald:
Police are having to shelve sexual assault complaints because witnesses are too drunk to remember the details. In Waikato alone, up to five complaints of sexual assaults are recorded each week, usually from women aged between 16 and 30, but many can not be acted on because of the high intoxication of people involved.What are the lessons? The first is to recognise the limitations of police, state, and judicial powers.
The problem also exists at another of the country's busiest police stations, Auckland Central.
Police cannot take a case to court without clear evidence. But some complainants were so drunk that officers' investigations - costly in police time and resources - were left in in limbo. "Sometimes it is so bad that they can't remember anything, nothing at all about the sexual assault," Detective Senior Sergeant Mark Greene of Hamilton told the Weekend Herald. "But they know they have been assaulted. It's also rare that someone walks in here and it's not genuine."
Saturday, 17 November 2012
Letter From America (About the Pencil)
It Takes a Thousand People to Create a Pencil
Justin Taylor|
Milton Friedman used to give an example of “The Power of the Pencil” as an illustration of the wonder of the free market—namely, that one person alone could not create the pencils we have, but a thousand people labor and cooperate together to produce a pencil that we can purchase for a a trifling sum. The video below tells the story well. For those who have eyes to see, it’s also an amazing testimony, I think, to divine providence and as our work as image bearers in reflecting his creativity (even if unwittingly) and having appropriate dominion over creation.
Justin Taylor|
Milton Friedman used to give an example of “The Power of the Pencil” as an illustration of the wonder of the free market—namely, that one person alone could not create the pencils we have, but a thousand people labor and cooperate together to produce a pencil that we can purchase for a a trifling sum. The video below tells the story well. For those who have eyes to see, it’s also an amazing testimony, I think, to divine providence and as our work as image bearers in reflecting his creativity (even if unwittingly) and having appropriate dominion over creation.
Atheists and Your Children, Part III
Propaganda, Child Abuse and the Gun
We have been considering a "reasonable proposition" put forward by distinguished psychologist, Nicholas Humphrey--to the effect that Christian parents who raise their children to know, understand, and believe the Christian faith are committing a form of child abuse. He puts it in the same category as parents performing clitorectomy upon daughters.
Children have a right not to be taught myths and lies, he averred to his audience at Amnesty International. The right to the truth overrides all parental and child rights. It overrides all free speech rights. He will defend free speech rights strenuously, but not in the home, unless children are being taught his particular world-view--which happens to be the dominant world view of our age. Children must be taught and trained in the world-view of scientism, which to materialist and atheist Humphrey is the only truth.
We can see how purblind he has become in his own ideology and secular religion in the following quotation:
We have been considering a "reasonable proposition" put forward by distinguished psychologist, Nicholas Humphrey--to the effect that Christian parents who raise their children to know, understand, and believe the Christian faith are committing a form of child abuse. He puts it in the same category as parents performing clitorectomy upon daughters.
Children have a right not to be taught myths and lies, he averred to his audience at Amnesty International. The right to the truth overrides all parental and child rights. It overrides all free speech rights. He will defend free speech rights strenuously, but not in the home, unless children are being taught his particular world-view--which happens to be the dominant world view of our age. Children must be taught and trained in the world-view of scientism, which to materialist and atheist Humphrey is the only truth.
We can see how purblind he has become in his own ideology and secular religion in the following quotation:
Friday, 16 November 2012
Atheists and Your Children, Part II
Propaganda Redivivus
In a previous post we spoke of the allegations and indictments being levelled by militant atheists against Christians. They have repeatedly asserted that parents teaching their children the doctrines and beliefs of the Christian faith is literally a form of child abuse.
Whilst some may assume that this is nothing more than a colourful rhetorical device, the insistence that such propositions and charges be taken literally lead one to think that what is going down here reflects the strategic and tactical position of a propagandist rather than a serious argument. Propaganda, of course, is not interested in the truth per se, nor in truthful discourse. It is interested in manipulation and ultimately control of mind. It appears, then, that atheists want control over the children whose parents are Christians. They want to control their minds. They want to interdict any influence their parents might otherwise have and substitute it with their own form of religion.
Is this extreme? Yes--but openly and seriously advocated nonetheless.
In a previous post we spoke of the allegations and indictments being levelled by militant atheists against Christians. They have repeatedly asserted that parents teaching their children the doctrines and beliefs of the Christian faith is literally a form of child abuse.
Whilst some may assume that this is nothing more than a colourful rhetorical device, the insistence that such propositions and charges be taken literally lead one to think that what is going down here reflects the strategic and tactical position of a propagandist rather than a serious argument. Propaganda, of course, is not interested in the truth per se, nor in truthful discourse. It is interested in manipulation and ultimately control of mind. It appears, then, that atheists want control over the children whose parents are Christians. They want to control their minds. They want to interdict any influence their parents might otherwise have and substitute it with their own form of religion.
Is this extreme? Yes--but openly and seriously advocated nonetheless.
Thursday, 15 November 2012
Atheists and Your Children, Part I
No Rhetorical Devices Here
It is no surprise to learn that militant atheists hate the Christian faith. And hate is not too strong a word. What else can be made of the assertions by Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens that the act of parents teaching their own children about God and the Christ and the redemption of the world and the judgment to come is an act of child abuse?
Maybe, one wonders, this indictment should be regarded as rhetorical flourish or vivid hyperbole. Dawkins, however, is firmly insistent that his words on this subject are neither hyperbolic nor a literary device in general. He means them in a literal sense. Here is Dawkins's gloss on his indictment of parents who teach their children the Christian faith:
It is no surprise to learn that militant atheists hate the Christian faith. And hate is not too strong a word. What else can be made of the assertions by Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens that the act of parents teaching their own children about God and the Christ and the redemption of the world and the judgment to come is an act of child abuse?
Maybe, one wonders, this indictment should be regarded as rhetorical flourish or vivid hyperbole. Dawkins, however, is firmly insistent that his words on this subject are neither hyperbolic nor a literary device in general. He means them in a literal sense. Here is Dawkins's gloss on his indictment of parents who teach their children the Christian faith:
Wednesday, 14 November 2012
Kyoto Takes the Shape of the Dodo
Whimpering Into Irrelevance
And now, some good news! Well, so far, so good, in any event. The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme and its Kyoto commitments are going the way of the dodo: that is, the way of extinction.
Our readers will be aware that we have never suffered the slightest inclination to accept the "science" of global warming or anthropocentric climate change. For the record, we do accept the reality of climate change. The Medieval Warm Period was real. The arctic ice-cap has shrunk almost to non-existence in the past. But by definition historical warming periods cannot have been caused by global GDP growth and carbon emissions, which back then they were much, much lower than they are now. Greenland is so named because of the explosion of green grass and farming that occurred there in the Medieval Warm Period of the fifteenth century.
Moreover anyone with an ounce of critical faculties will remain profoundly sceptical of a "science" consisting of computer models projecting climate conditions hundreds of years into the future based upon hypothetical inputs which have more assumptions baked into them than chocolate chips in the proverbial cookie.
All in all, parking the New Zealand ETS on the side and suspending our involvement in Kyoto II is a good thing. Here is where New Zealand is now at, as reported in the NZ Herald:
And now, some good news! Well, so far, so good, in any event. The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme and its Kyoto commitments are going the way of the dodo: that is, the way of extinction.
Our readers will be aware that we have never suffered the slightest inclination to accept the "science" of global warming or anthropocentric climate change. For the record, we do accept the reality of climate change. The Medieval Warm Period was real. The arctic ice-cap has shrunk almost to non-existence in the past. But by definition historical warming periods cannot have been caused by global GDP growth and carbon emissions, which back then they were much, much lower than they are now. Greenland is so named because of the explosion of green grass and farming that occurred there in the Medieval Warm Period of the fifteenth century.
Moreover anyone with an ounce of critical faculties will remain profoundly sceptical of a "science" consisting of computer models projecting climate conditions hundreds of years into the future based upon hypothetical inputs which have more assumptions baked into them than chocolate chips in the proverbial cookie.
All in all, parking the New Zealand ETS on the side and suspending our involvement in Kyoto II is a good thing. Here is where New Zealand is now at, as reported in the NZ Herald:
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
Douglas Wilson's Letter From America
Wheat and Darnel
Expository - Parables
Written by Douglas Wilson
Saturday, 20 October 2012
INTRODUCTION:
The problem of good and evil inhabiting the same place is a perennial problem. It has been a problem within the church from the very beginning, and Jesus taught in such a way as to prepare us for it. Another parable, that of the dragnet (Matt. 13:47-48), makes the same basic point. Cast a net, and you bring in bicycle tires and beer bottles along with the fish. Why should we be surprised? Unfortunately, one of the evils we must deal with is the fact that we tend to reject His preparatory help.
THE TEXT:
“Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way . . .” (Matt. 13:24-30, 36-43).
SUMMARY OF THE TEXT:
Jesus told His disciples another parable. The kingdom of heaven was like a man sowing good seed in his field (v. 24). But during the night, an enemy of his came and sowed tares (likely darnel) and left (v. 25). When the wheat began to grow, it became apparent that the darnel was growing also (v. 26). The servants saw the problem and came and asked about it (v. 27).
Expository - Parables
Written by Douglas Wilson
Saturday, 20 October 2012
INTRODUCTION:
The problem of good and evil inhabiting the same place is a perennial problem. It has been a problem within the church from the very beginning, and Jesus taught in such a way as to prepare us for it. Another parable, that of the dragnet (Matt. 13:47-48), makes the same basic point. Cast a net, and you bring in bicycle tires and beer bottles along with the fish. Why should we be surprised? Unfortunately, one of the evils we must deal with is the fact that we tend to reject His preparatory help.
THE TEXT:
“Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way . . .” (Matt. 13:24-30, 36-43).
SUMMARY OF THE TEXT:
Jesus told His disciples another parable. The kingdom of heaven was like a man sowing good seed in his field (v. 24). But during the night, an enemy of his came and sowed tares (likely darnel) and left (v. 25). When the wheat began to grow, it became apparent that the darnel was growing also (v. 26). The servants saw the problem and came and asked about it (v. 27).
Empty Chair and Tables in the House of the Lord
Baalism, Britain, and the Cult of the Holy Nation
When once-Christian cultures turn away from the God of our fathers usually a substitute deity occupies the vacuum. This new god is supposed to function as the Living God had in the culture of former generations. People need to believe in something or someone--particularly when former generations professed a living faith in the true God.
The experience of our ancient fathers has been an apt teacher. When the northern kingdom split away from Judea at the passing of King Solomon the northern king deliberately sought to set up a false cult to fill the vacuum created, by throwing off loyalty to God. Baal was the choice. Baal was an idol of power, ministered and institutionalised and made visible through the State.
Similarly in our post-Christian, post-modern world, amidst all the nihilism and dissolution there is one authority, one locus of unity to which the people have repeatedly and persistently turned
--Baal, the god and religion of the state.
When once-Christian cultures turn away from the God of our fathers usually a substitute deity occupies the vacuum. This new god is supposed to function as the Living God had in the culture of former generations. People need to believe in something or someone--particularly when former generations professed a living faith in the true God.
The experience of our ancient fathers has been an apt teacher. When the northern kingdom split away from Judea at the passing of King Solomon the northern king deliberately sought to set up a false cult to fill the vacuum created, by throwing off loyalty to God. Baal was the choice. Baal was an idol of power, ministered and institutionalised and made visible through the State.
Similarly in our post-Christian, post-modern world, amidst all the nihilism and dissolution there is one authority, one locus of unity to which the people have repeatedly and persistently turned
--Baal, the god and religion of the state.
Monday, 12 November 2012
Measuring God by Human Dimensions
4 Lessons from God’s Interrogation of Job
Republished from Justin Taylor's blog
Andy Naselli on Job 38:1—42:6, from his book From Typology to Doxology: Paul’s Use of Isaiah and Job in Romans 11:34-35:
1. God is too small in Job’s eyes.
Prior to God’s interrogation of Job, Job’s perception of God is too soft, too tame, too domesticated. But God’s questions underscore his unshakable trustworthiness as uniquely and infinitely wise, sovereign, just, and good. God is not someone whom Job can drag into court so that he and God can argue their case before an impartial judge. The Almighty God is without peer. He himself is the judge, jury, executioner, and standard of justice.
2. Correspondingly, Job is too large in his own eyes.
God gives Job a theocentric view of the universe because Job cannot help viewing God’s world with himself at its center.
Andy Naselli on Job 38:1—42:6, from his book From Typology to Doxology: Paul’s Use of Isaiah and Job in Romans 11:34-35:
1. God is too small in Job’s eyes.
Prior to God’s interrogation of Job, Job’s perception of God is too soft, too tame, too domesticated. But God’s questions underscore his unshakable trustworthiness as uniquely and infinitely wise, sovereign, just, and good. God is not someone whom Job can drag into court so that he and God can argue their case before an impartial judge. The Almighty God is without peer. He himself is the judge, jury, executioner, and standard of justice.
2. Correspondingly, Job is too large in his own eyes.
God gives Job a theocentric view of the universe because Job cannot help viewing God’s world with himself at its center.
Willingly Blind
The Fruits of Atheism
The huffing, puffing, militant atheists have an argument that runs in the following form. Evil exists in the world due to the incomplete, imperfect stages of more primitive creatures. Evil will be progressively eradicated as mankind achieves an ever higher evolutionary state. Religion and religious belief reflects a more primitive condition of humanity beyond which man is progressively evolving. Therefore, religion and evil are inextricably bound together. If you are primitive, you will likely be religious. If you are religious you will be evil.
We are not concerned so much at this point with the asinine internal contradictions in the ruminations above. What we wish to focus upon at this point is the implicit proposition that atheism and, therefore, atheist civilizations are at a more advanced stage of evolution than religious ones.
The huffing, puffing, militant atheists have an argument that runs in the following form. Evil exists in the world due to the incomplete, imperfect stages of more primitive creatures. Evil will be progressively eradicated as mankind achieves an ever higher evolutionary state. Religion and religious belief reflects a more primitive condition of humanity beyond which man is progressively evolving. Therefore, religion and evil are inextricably bound together. If you are primitive, you will likely be religious. If you are religious you will be evil.
We are not concerned so much at this point with the asinine internal contradictions in the ruminations above. What we wish to focus upon at this point is the implicit proposition that atheism and, therefore, atheist civilizations are at a more advanced stage of evolution than religious ones.
Saturday, 10 November 2012
Regime of Small Kindnesses
Sacramental Home Life
Marilynne Robinson reflects upon society, homes and housekeeping:
Marilynne Robinson reflects upon society, homes and housekeeping:
. . . . I must say too how beautiful human society seems to me, especially in those attenuated forms so characteristic of the West--isolated towns and single houses which sometimes offer only the merest, barest amenities: light, warmth, supper, familiarity. We have colonized a hostile planet, and we must stanch every opening where cold and dark might pour through and destroy the false climates we make, the tiny simulations of forgotten seasons beside the Euphrates or Eden.
At a certain level housekeeping is a regime of small kindnesses, which taken together, make the world salubrious, savory and warm. I think of the acts of comfort offered and received within a household as precisely sacramental. It is the sad tendency of domesticity--as of piety--to contract and of grace to decay into rigor and peace into tedium. [Marilynne Robinson, When I Was a Child I Read Books (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2012), p. 93.]
Libertarian Vacuity
Demons Will Return to the Empty House
What are the building blocks of civilisation? The libertarian answer is straightforward, if simplistic: civilisation will be built upon free contracts entered into by individuals, once the state is dismantled. Roll the state back to a minimalist entity and you are left with a free people. These free people, acting out of self interest, will enter into formal and informal contractual arrangements for their own (and mutual) benefit.
But what if the "free" people were universally enslaved to lusts and self-indulgence?
What are the building blocks of civilisation? The libertarian answer is straightforward, if simplistic: civilisation will be built upon free contracts entered into by individuals, once the state is dismantled. Roll the state back to a minimalist entity and you are left with a free people. These free people, acting out of self interest, will enter into formal and informal contractual arrangements for their own (and mutual) benefit.
But what if the "free" people were universally enslaved to lusts and self-indulgence?
Friday, 9 November 2012
Douglas Wilson's Letter From America
Seven Post Mortem Principles
Politics Written by Douglas Wilson
Wednesday, 07 November 2012
1. The first principle is not just that Jesus is Lord. That wonderful phrase is our foundational confession; it is not simply a sweet sentiment to tide us over until the sweet by and by. Rather we must say that Jesus is the Lord of history, and so He is the one who gave this electoral outcome to us. We don't fully know why He did, but we know that He did.
2. Given the wickedness of key elements in Obama's agenda (abortion, sodomy, thievery through taxation, etc.) we know that whatever the Lord is doing, it is for judgment and not for blessing. And in Scripture, whenever judgment is pending, or has begun, the appropriate response is repentance -- not mobilization or organizing our remaining tatters.
Politics Written by Douglas Wilson
Wednesday, 07 November 2012
1. The first principle is not just that Jesus is Lord. That wonderful phrase is our foundational confession; it is not simply a sweet sentiment to tide us over until the sweet by and by. Rather we must say that Jesus is the Lord of history, and so He is the one who gave this electoral outcome to us. We don't fully know why He did, but we know that He did.
2. Given the wickedness of key elements in Obama's agenda (abortion, sodomy, thievery through taxation, etc.) we know that whatever the Lord is doing, it is for judgment and not for blessing. And in Scripture, whenever judgment is pending, or has begun, the appropriate response is repentance -- not mobilization or organizing our remaining tatters.
Re-Setting the Chess Board
Truth Will Out, For Good or Ill
The times they are a changin'. Or, to quote Cornelius Van Til, both Belief and Unbelief, Christians and their opponents move inevitably over time to greater and greater epistemological self-consciousness. The core conflict between Belief and Unbelief bubbles to the surface, as each becomes more true to itself and its fundamental axioms and beliefs. The internal logic of a belief position works itself out. Inconsistencies, throwbacks, restraints get removed. Faiths become more faithful; their inevitable consequences increasingly reified and manifest.
When socialism first became endorsed, then advocated by the Establishment, particularly in the United Kingdom, it had trappings of the Christian faith festooned on its battlements.
The times they are a changin'. Or, to quote Cornelius Van Til, both Belief and Unbelief, Christians and their opponents move inevitably over time to greater and greater epistemological self-consciousness. The core conflict between Belief and Unbelief bubbles to the surface, as each becomes more true to itself and its fundamental axioms and beliefs. The internal logic of a belief position works itself out. Inconsistencies, throwbacks, restraints get removed. Faiths become more faithful; their inevitable consequences increasingly reified and manifest.
When socialism first became endorsed, then advocated by the Establishment, particularly in the United Kingdom, it had trappings of the Christian faith festooned on its battlements.
Thursday, 8 November 2012
Noted in Passing
Compelling Tributes
Tributes have been flowing in posthumously for barrister, Greg King. Some of them are impressive, given their source.
We did not know Mr King personally at all. We have only known him through the filtered eye of the media. By reputation he was one of the leading defence barristers in the country. Here is a summary of some of the more significant tributes:
Firstly, from the parents of murdered Sophie Elliott. King defended at trial the subsequently convicted murderer, Clayton Weatherston.
Tributes have been flowing in posthumously for barrister, Greg King. Some of them are impressive, given their source.
We did not know Mr King personally at all. We have only known him through the filtered eye of the media. By reputation he was one of the leading defence barristers in the country. Here is a summary of some of the more significant tributes:
Firstly, from the parents of murdered Sophie Elliott. King defended at trial the subsequently convicted murderer, Clayton Weatherston.
Preening Self-Importance
Judicial Pettifogging
We recently had a judge in this fair country who suspended a court case about very serious criminal offending by a criminal gang. The pretext: judicial offence. The judge believed the police had not treated the courts and judges with suitable gravity and respect. Therefore, like a petulant child, he stayed the prosecution. How puerile.
Here is columnist John Roughan's take on the matter:
We recently had a judge in this fair country who suspended a court case about very serious criminal offending by a criminal gang. The pretext: judicial offence. The judge believed the police had not treated the courts and judges with suitable gravity and respect. Therefore, like a petulant child, he stayed the prosecution. How puerile.
Here is columnist John Roughan's take on the matter:
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
Letter from the UK (About Education)
'Bog-Standard' Schools are Unacceptable
In New Zealand we are having an on-going debate over the relative value and importance of reading, writing and arithmetic. There are plenty of professional educational "experts" who argue that while these subject areas are acceptable, there are plenty of other subjects. Pupils are wired differently. They ought not to be forced into a one-size-fits-all pedagogical box.
On the other side are plenty of people operating in the "real world" who know that if you cannot read, cannot write, and cannot do arithmetic you cannot function effectively. These subjects are the foundational sub-stratum of all other learning.
A similar debate is taking place in the UK. Graham Archer, writing in The Telegraph tells us his own story of school.
In New Zealand we are having an on-going debate over the relative value and importance of reading, writing and arithmetic. There are plenty of professional educational "experts" who argue that while these subject areas are acceptable, there are plenty of other subjects. Pupils are wired differently. They ought not to be forced into a one-size-fits-all pedagogical box.
On the other side are plenty of people operating in the "real world" who know that if you cannot read, cannot write, and cannot do arithmetic you cannot function effectively. These subjects are the foundational sub-stratum of all other learning.
A similar debate is taking place in the UK. Graham Archer, writing in The Telegraph tells us his own story of school.
Well Done, Madam Secretary
Spraying Cornflakes
We have been critical of the education establishment in New Zealand. Unlike every other country in the OECD, our education system is a virtual dominated by government schools. The education ministry appears excessively influenced by ex-teachers. The teacher unions are active participants in politics, constantly criticising and dumping on any government initiative which appears to threaten union member privileges, conditions, and income growth.
Above all there is a steady barrage of propaganda to the effect that the New Zealand government eduction system is the best education system in the world. Any suggestion that it might have some inadequacies or weaknesses is pounced upon with the fury of magpie whose chick is threatened--unless of course the alleged weakness is teacher salaries and working conditions. This scabrous behaviour is defended by the propagandists oft-intoned assertion that they are only and ever acting in the best interests of pupils and young people
We have been critical of the education establishment in New Zealand. Unlike every other country in the OECD, our education system is a virtual dominated by government schools. The education ministry appears excessively influenced by ex-teachers. The teacher unions are active participants in politics, constantly criticising and dumping on any government initiative which appears to threaten union member privileges, conditions, and income growth.
Above all there is a steady barrage of propaganda to the effect that the New Zealand government eduction system is the best education system in the world. Any suggestion that it might have some inadequacies or weaknesses is pounced upon with the fury of magpie whose chick is threatened--unless of course the alleged weakness is teacher salaries and working conditions. This scabrous behaviour is defended by the propagandists oft-intoned assertion that they are only and ever acting in the best interests of pupils and young people
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
Douglas Wilson's Letter From America
Final Election Round-Up
Culture and Politics - Politics
Written by Douglas Wilson
Saturday, 03 November 2012
Here is your final political round-up before the Zombie Apocalypse next Tuesday.
My friend Kevin Swanson makes some important points here, and I will wait for you until you get back. In the midst of that post, he notes the following facts concerning the cancerous growth of the state, under both Republicans and Democrats.
Annualized Growth in Spending:
Reagan -- first term -- 8.7%
Reagan -- second term -- 4.9%
Bush I -- 5.4%
Clinton -- first term -- 3.2%
Clinton -- second term -- 3.9%
Bush 2 -- first term -- 7.3%
Bush 2 -- second term -- 8.1%
Obama -- 1.4%[1]
While I think Kevin makes an important point here, I would like to
throw in a significant "yeah, but." When we annualize the growth rates
of the federal government, it is important for us to remember who had
control of the two chambers of Congress at the time.
Culture and Politics - Politics
Written by Douglas Wilson
Saturday, 03 November 2012
Here is your final political round-up before the Zombie Apocalypse next Tuesday.
My friend Kevin Swanson makes some important points here, and I will wait for you until you get back. In the midst of that post, he notes the following facts concerning the cancerous growth of the state, under both Republicans and Democrats.
Annualized Growth in Spending:
Reagan -- first term -- 8.7%
Reagan -- second term -- 4.9%
Bush I -- 5.4%
Clinton -- first term -- 3.2%
Clinton -- second term -- 3.9%
Bush 2 -- first term -- 7.3%
Bush 2 -- second term -- 8.1%
Obama -- 1.4%[1]
Bitterness and Thwarted Hopes
Hell Hath No Fury . . .
It's official. Well, it's in the Guardian, so that makes it a grave matter, non? It was only a few short months ago that Francois Hollande was elected President of France. He came into the Champs-Elysees riding a big white horse, touting the biggest election victory for socialism in living memory. He was going to turn Europe around. He was going to tax the rich (70 percent at the margin). He was going to stand up to Angela Merkel. He was going to rein in France's soaring public debt. He was . . . . Now, it seems he was going . . . always going to go down the tubes.
Here is the Guardian's summary:
It's official. Well, it's in the Guardian, so that makes it a grave matter, non? It was only a few short months ago that Francois Hollande was elected President of France. He came into the Champs-Elysees riding a big white horse, touting the biggest election victory for socialism in living memory. He was going to turn Europe around. He was going to tax the rich (70 percent at the margin). He was going to stand up to Angela Merkel. He was going to rein in France's soaring public debt. He was . . . . Now, it seems he was going . . . always going to go down the tubes.
Here is the Guardian's summary:
Monday, 5 November 2012
The Benghazi Bungles
Culture and Politics - Politics
Written by Douglas Wilson
Monday, 29 October 2012
I have followed the Benghazi story generally but have not said much about it to date here in this space. But as more and more information comes out about it, the debacle appears to be either evil and high cyncism that got caught in the act, or it is the result of a staggering incompetence,. And, given the fact that more than a few people had to have been involved in it, it was perhaps both.
There are at least three layers to the story/scandal.
Culture and Politics - Politics
Written by Douglas Wilson
Monday, 29 October 2012
I have followed the Benghazi story generally but have not said much about it to date here in this space. But as more and more information comes out about it, the debacle appears to be either evil and high cyncism that got caught in the act, or it is the result of a staggering incompetence,. And, given the fact that more than a few people had to have been involved in it, it was perhaps both.
There are at least three layers to the story/scandal.
Surprise
Progressive Groupthink
The New York Times has endorsed Barack Obama for president. As a child might say, "No surprises there." But why? Why was this endorsement entirely predictable? We could have confidently pronounced four years ago, even eight or twelve years ago that in 2012 the Times would endorse the Democratic candidate for the presidency. How come?
Firstly, empirical historical evidence is overwhelming. The Times has endorsed the Democratic candidate for over fifty years. In fact, it has even provided an interactive graphic of its record so that there can be no doubt.
The New York Times has endorsed Barack Obama for president. As a child might say, "No surprises there." But why? Why was this endorsement entirely predictable? We could have confidently pronounced four years ago, even eight or twelve years ago that in 2012 the Times would endorse the Democratic candidate for the presidency. How come?
Firstly, empirical historical evidence is overwhelming. The Times has endorsed the Democratic candidate for over fifty years. In fact, it has even provided an interactive graphic of its record so that there can be no doubt.
Saturday, 3 November 2012
Letter From America (About the Real Obama)
Noonan: When Americans Saw the Real Obama
Why the Denver debate changed everything.
Wall Street Journal
We all say Ohio, Ohio, Ohio. But it's all still Denver, Denver, and the mystery that maybe isn't a mystery at all. If Cincinnati and Lake County go for Mitt Romney on Nov. 6 it will be because of what happened in Denver on Oct. 3. If Barack Obama barely scrapes through, if there's a bloody and prolonged recount, it too will be because of Denver.
Nothing echoes out like that debate. It was the moment that allowed Mr. Romney to break through, that allowed dismay with the incumbent to coalesce, that allowed voters to consider the alternative. . . .
Maybe the president himself didn't think he could possibly be beaten because he's so beloved. Presidents are always given good news, to keep their spirits up. The poll numbers he'd been seeing, the get-out-the-vote reports, the extraordinary Internet effort to connect with every lonely person in America, which is a lot of persons—maybe everything he was hearing left him thinking his position was impregnable.
But maybe these questions are all off. Maybe what happened isn't a mystery at all.
Oxymorons Aplenty
Private Religion Only Need Apply
One potent component of Tolkien's Lord of the Rings is the author's ability to describe and convey the slime, the decay, the degradation of Mordor and its works. It befouled everything it touched.
We have seen Mordoresque societies in recent history. These have not been fictional representations. They are the real article. Peter Hitchens reflects upon life in the Soviet Union as he experienced it for years as a foreign correspondent. Reading these words makes Reagan's "honorific", the Evil Empire appear apt. But we must bear in mind that the Soviet Union was overtly created to be the first atheist civilization--the first self-conscious civilization of Unbelief.
One potent component of Tolkien's Lord of the Rings is the author's ability to describe and convey the slime, the decay, the degradation of Mordor and its works. It befouled everything it touched.
We have seen Mordoresque societies in recent history. These have not been fictional representations. They are the real article. Peter Hitchens reflects upon life in the Soviet Union as he experienced it for years as a foreign correspondent. Reading these words makes Reagan's "honorific", the Evil Empire appear apt. But we must bear in mind that the Soviet Union was overtly created to be the first atheist civilization--the first self-conscious civilization of Unbelief.
Friday, 2 November 2012
Leaving Mordor
The Division Bell
Roman Catholic voters in the United States have traditionally backed the Democrats. The Roman Catholic vote has, until recently, been considered a key segment/demographic by the Democratic Party. No longer. As the Democratic party has moved to a position more consistent with its secularist ideology it has become more stridently anti-Christian and anti-God. The Obama administration has thought nothing of forcing Christians to be complicit in the funding of evil practices such as abortion and abortifacient contraceptives.
The Roman Catholic church is reacting as you would expect Christians everywhere to react.
Roman Catholic voters in the United States have traditionally backed the Democrats. The Roman Catholic vote has, until recently, been considered a key segment/demographic by the Democratic Party. No longer. As the Democratic party has moved to a position more consistent with its secularist ideology it has become more stridently anti-Christian and anti-God. The Obama administration has thought nothing of forcing Christians to be complicit in the funding of evil practices such as abortion and abortifacient contraceptives.
The Roman Catholic church is reacting as you would expect Christians everywhere to react.
Douglas Wilson's Letter From America
Ghoulish Gotcha
Culture and Politics - Sex and Culture
Written by Douglas Wilson
Thursday, 25 October 2012
In a panicked attempt to deflect attention away from an increasingly desperate president, the Fourth Estate is trying to interest us in the purported gaffes of two Republican candidates -- first Akin, and now Mourdock -- on the subject of pregnancy that is the result of rape. So let's talk about that for a minute.
From the reports, Akin's response was clumsier than Mourdock's, and yet the same kind of reaction can be seen to both of them. The wimpy Republican establishment dropped Akin like a hot rock -- though it now looks as though he may win anyway -- and the returns are still out on Mourdock.
When a rape results in a pregnancy, this means that we are now dealing with three people instead of two.
Culture and Politics - Sex and Culture
Written by Douglas Wilson
Thursday, 25 October 2012
In a panicked attempt to deflect attention away from an increasingly desperate president, the Fourth Estate is trying to interest us in the purported gaffes of two Republican candidates -- first Akin, and now Mourdock -- on the subject of pregnancy that is the result of rape. So let's talk about that for a minute.
From the reports, Akin's response was clumsier than Mourdock's, and yet the same kind of reaction can be seen to both of them. The wimpy Republican establishment dropped Akin like a hot rock -- though it now looks as though he may win anyway -- and the returns are still out on Mourdock.
When a rape results in a pregnancy, this means that we are now dealing with three people instead of two.
Essential Scepticism
Fools Gold
Our father used to tell us that a fool and his money are soon parted. Every scam that hits the gullible is an old one. It has been used countless times before. Everyone who gets caught is either wilfully ignorant or they stupidly believe that this time it will be different.
Back in the eighties we had in New Zealand a grand scheme of central government's confabulation. It was decided that economic nirvana would descend upon New Zealand if agricultural production picked up. It was decided by the wise that what was needed was more bush covered hills being converted into farmland, and we needed more types of cropping and animal husbandry--such as goats and alpacas. To encourage people to undertake these inevitably risky ventures, the government promised subsidies, cheap credit, minimum prices for agricultural products, tax write-offs and a host of other government supports.
A speculative agricultural gold rush commenced that rivalled the Kalgoorlie and Otago rushes, mutatis mutandis. Enterprising individuals began farming government subsidies and hand outs, not agricultural goods.
Our father used to tell us that a fool and his money are soon parted. Every scam that hits the gullible is an old one. It has been used countless times before. Everyone who gets caught is either wilfully ignorant or they stupidly believe that this time it will be different.
Back in the eighties we had in New Zealand a grand scheme of central government's confabulation. It was decided that economic nirvana would descend upon New Zealand if agricultural production picked up. It was decided by the wise that what was needed was more bush covered hills being converted into farmland, and we needed more types of cropping and animal husbandry--such as goats and alpacas. To encourage people to undertake these inevitably risky ventures, the government promised subsidies, cheap credit, minimum prices for agricultural products, tax write-offs and a host of other government supports.
A speculative agricultural gold rush commenced that rivalled the Kalgoorlie and Otago rushes, mutatis mutandis. Enterprising individuals began farming government subsidies and hand outs, not agricultural goods.
Thursday, 1 November 2012
Letter From America (Predicting the Election)
Sticking The Neck Out
At least one pundit is predicting a Republican landslide next week. We shall see.
Opinion: Here comes the landslide
By Dick Morris - 10/30/12
The Hill
Voters have figured out that President Obama has no message, no agenda and not even much of an explanation for what he has done over the past four years. His campaign is based entirely on persuading people that Mitt Romney is a uniquely bad man, entirely dedicated to the rich, ignorant of the problems of the average person. As long as he could run his negative ads, the campaign at least kept voters away from the Romney bandwagon. But once we all met Mitt Romney for three 90-minute debates, we got to know him — and to like him. He was not the monster Obama depicted, but a reasonable person for whom we could vote.
As we stripped away Obama’s yearlong campaign of vilification, all the president offered us was more servings of negative ads — ads we had already dismissed as not credible. He kept doing the same thing even as it stopped working.
At least one pundit is predicting a Republican landslide next week. We shall see.
Opinion: Here comes the landslide
By Dick Morris - 10/30/12
The Hill
Voters have figured out that President Obama has no message, no agenda and not even much of an explanation for what he has done over the past four years. His campaign is based entirely on persuading people that Mitt Romney is a uniquely bad man, entirely dedicated to the rich, ignorant of the problems of the average person. As long as he could run his negative ads, the campaign at least kept voters away from the Romney bandwagon. But once we all met Mitt Romney for three 90-minute debates, we got to know him — and to like him. He was not the monster Obama depicted, but a reasonable person for whom we could vote.
As we stripped away Obama’s yearlong campaign of vilification, all the president offered us was more servings of negative ads — ads we had already dismissed as not credible. He kept doing the same thing even as it stopped working.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)