Wednesday, 12 November 2014

Withering on the Vine

The Demographic Time Bomb is Most Marked in Japan

The demographic time bomb – whereby the elderly population assumes a greater and greater proportion of the total population - is no more marked than in Japan.

Falling birth rates (as a result of abortion, contraception and delaying childbirth) and increasing longevity as a result of better medical care have created this situation.

If we look at the population age structure in Japan (see graph above) we can see how dramatically its shape has changed since 1950 and how much more it will change by 2050.

The same trends are spelt out numerically in the table below where different countries are compared.
Unless something is done to reverse the demographic trends, ‘economic necessity’, together with the ‘culture of death’ ideology which is becoming more openly accepted, may well mean that the generation that killed its children through abortion will in turn be killed by its own children through euthanasia.

The population pyramid of 1950 shows that Japan had a standard-shaped pyramid marked by a broad base. The shape of the pyramid, however, has changed dramatically as both the birth rate and death rate have declined.

In 1950 the population of elderly citizens (65 years and over) accounted for just 4.9% of the total population. This had risen to 21.5% by 2007 and will rise to 39.6% by 2050.

Daily Devotional

Receiving Christ Himself

"As ye have received Christ Jesus the Lord."
Colossians 2:6

Charles Spurgeon

The life of faith is represented as receiving--an act which implies the very opposite of anything like merit. It is simply the acceptance of a gift. As the earth drinks in the rain, as the sea receives the streams, as night accepts light from the stars, so we, giving nothing, partake freely of the grace of God. The saints are not, by nature, wells, or streams, they are but cisterns into which the living water flows; they are empty vessels into which God pours his salvation.

The idea of receiving implies a sense of realization, making the matter a reality. One cannot very well receive a shadow; we receive that which is substantial: so is it in the life of faith, Christ becomes real to us. While we are without faith, Jesus is a mere name to us--a person who lived a long while ago, so long ago that his life is only a history to us now! By an act of faith Jesus becomes a real person in the consciousness of our heart.

But receiving also means grasping or getting possession of. The thing which I receive becomes my own: I appropriate to myself that which is given. When I receive Jesus, he becomes my Saviour, so mine that neither life nor death shall be able to rob me of him. All this is to receive Christ--to take him as God's free gift; to realize him in my heart, and to appropriate him as mine.

Salvation may be described as the blind receiving sight, the deaf receiving hearing, the dead receiving life; but we have not only received these blessings, we have received Christ Jesus himself. It is true that he gave us life from the dead. He gave us pardon of sin; he gave us imputed righteousness. These are all precious things, but we are not content with them; we have received Christ himself. The Son of God has been poured into us, and we have received him, and appropriated him.

What a heartful Jesus must be, for heaven itself cannot contain him!

When the Old Becomes Startlingly New

At Last, Some Sense in Education

Every so often a piece is published which is like a ray of common-sense amidst a dark night of foolishness.  And so it came to pass on October 31st, 2014.  The Sutton Trust published some research conducted by Professor Robert Coe of Durham University and colleagues. The website blurb on the Sutton Trust reads as follows:
The Sutton Trust was founded in 1997 by Sir Peter Lampl to improve social mobility through education.  As well as being a think-tank, the Sutton Trust is a ‘do-tank,’ having funded over 200 programmes, commissioned over 140 research studies and influenced Government education policy by pushing social mobility to the top of the political agenda.
The title of the research is, What Makes Great Teaching? Review of the Underpinning Research.   The Sutton Trust, a co-sponsor of the work, provided an executive summary of what has become evident to the researchers:
This report reviews over 200 pieces of research to identify the elements of teaching with the strongest evidence of improving attainment. It finds some common practices can be harmful to learning and have no grounding in research. Specific practices which are supported by good evidence of their effectiveness are also examined and six key factors that contribute to great teaching are identified. The report also analyses different methods of evaluating teaching including: using ‘value-added’ results from student test scores; observing classroom teaching; and getting students to rate the quality of their teaching.
To improve pupil attainment there are two key factors which must be at work:

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

Bold Witness to the Truth

Muhammad and Islam's Sex Slaves

by Raymond Ibrahim
FrontPage Magazine
October 16, 2014

Once again, Islamic State Muslims are pointing to Islam in order to justify what the civilized world counts as atrocities.

According to an October 13 report in the Telegraph,
Islamic State jihadists have given detailed theological reasons justifying why they have taken thousands of women from the Iraqi Yazidi minority and sold them into sex slavery. A new article in the Islamic State English-language online magazine Dabiq not only admits the practice but justifies it according to the theological rulings of early Islam. "After capture, the Yazidi women and children were then divided according to the Sharia amongst the fighters of the Islamic State who participated," the article says.
As for "theological reasons" for sex slavery "according to the Sharia," these are legion—from male Muslim clerics, to female Muslim activists. Generally they need do no more than cite the clear words of Koran 4:3, which permit Muslims to copulate with female captives of war, or ma malakat aymanukum, "what"—not whom—"your right hands possess."

The article continues:

Daily Devotional

Is God’s Love Conditional?

Draw near to God and he will draw near to you. (James 4:8)

John Piper


This verse means that there is a precious experience of peace and assurance and harmony and intimacy that is not unconditional. It depends on our not grieving the Spirit.

It depends on our putting away bad habits. It depends on forsaking the petty inconsistencies of our Christian lives. It depends on our walking closely with God and aiming at the highest degree of holiness.

If this is true, I fear that the unguarded reassurances today that God’s love is unconditional may stop people from doing the very things the Bible says they need to do in order to have the peace that they so desperately crave. In trying to give peace through “unconditionality” we may be cutting people off from the very remedy the Bible prescribes.

Let us declare untiringly the good news that our justification is based on the worth of Christ’s obedience and sacrifice, not ours (Romans 5:19, “as through the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the One the many will be made righteous”).

But let us also declare the biblical truth that the enjoyment of that justification in its effect on our joy and confidence and power to grow in likeness to Jesus is conditioned on our actively forsaking sins and forsaking bad habits and mortifying lusts and pursuing intimacy with Christ, and not grieving the Spirit.

For more about John Piper's ministry and writing, see DesiringGod.org.

God's Truth Abideth Still

The Leftist's Chief Rival

The West has become "anti-God".  But what God are they opposed to.  Not the god of Islam--Allah--although the West does not particularly like the things which Islamists do.  Rather, the West offers a number of apologies for such behaviour.  We are told that the Islamists are not really believers in Islam, but heretics.  They do not represent what is truly Islamic.  The West cannot bring itself to speak out against a deity called Allah.

The Deity which the West opposes is the Christian's God.  The West is threatened by Him who is "infinite, eternal, and unchangeable".  It is disturbed by people--Christians in this instance--living within its respective national borders who are not only prepared, but willing to say, "No" to the relentless drive towards a secular utopia.  But, once again, the question is begged as to why Western secularists are intimidated.  After all, by any measure, the beliefs of the secularists control just about every important node of power and influence in our cultures.  Secularism controls the schools, the law courts, the legislative arms of government, political discourse in general, and the market place.

There are two reasons why secular humanism is intimidated by God and Christians.

Monday, 10 November 2014

Too True

Mmmmmm

Tickld


Daily Devotional

Can God Forsake Us?

"Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands."
Isaiah 49:16

Charles Spurgeon

No doubt a part of the wonder which is concentrated in the word "Behold," is excited by the unbelieving lamentation of the preceding sentence. Zion said, "The Lord hath forsaken me, and my God hath forgotten me." How amazed the divine mind seems to be at this wicked unbelief! What can be more astounding than the unfounded doubts and fears of God's favoured people? The Lord's loving word of rebuke should make us blush; he cries, "How can I have forgotten thee, when I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands?

How darest thou doubt my constant remembrance, when the memorial is set upon my very flesh?" O unbelief, how strange a marvel thou art! We know not which most to wonder at, the faithfulness of God or the unbelief of his people. He keeps his promise a thousand times, and yet the next trial makes us doubt him. He never faileth; he is never a dry well; he is never as a setting sun, a passing meteor, or a melting vapour; and yet we are as continually vexed with anxieties, molested with suspicions, and disturbed with fears, as if our God were the mirage of the desert. "Behold," is a word intended to excite admiration. Here, indeed, we have a theme for marvelling.

Heaven and earth may well be astonished that rebels should obtain so great a nearness to the heart of infinite love as to be written upon the palms of his hands. "I have graven thee." It does not say, "Thy name." The name is there, but that is not all: "I have graven thee." See the fulness of this! I have graven thy person, thine image, thy case, thy circumstances, thy sins, thy temptations, thy weaknesses, thy wants, thy works; I have graven thee, everything about thee, all that concerns thee; I have put thee altogether there.

Wilt thou ever say again that thy God hath forsaken thee when he has graven thee upon his own palms?

The Wisdom of Gaffer Gamgee

Stupid Is As Stupid Does

One of the most compelling evidences that interventionist foreign policies fail is that they almost always end up resembling an asylum run by lunatics.  The outcomes and results are most often hard to credit.  One can do little more than document the twists and gyrations, the irrational stupidities, and the incredible contradictions that inevitably transpire.  It all seems much, much stranger than fiction.  An example?  Peter Hitchens asks us to consider the recent track record of the West in Afghanistan. 
. . . Afghanistan, where the nominally Christian West, having once mobilized warrior Islam against the Soviet Union (which was the ally of the Arabs in their war against Israel), now fights a furious war against warrior Islam.  Islam in its turn has repaid past American help with terrorist attacks on New York and Washington DC.  Amusingly, it was the USSR that once claimed to be liberating the women of Afghanistan from the tyranny of Islam, a task it has successfully achieved in its own Central Asian empire.  Now it is the "West" which tried so hard to drive the USSR out of Afghanistan, that says its troops must remain there . . . to protect Afghan women from the tyranny of Islam.  Is this a war caused by religion, or by human folly?  (Peter Hitchens, The Rage Against God: How Atheism Led Me to Faith (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010), p. 132.]
Yet what is it about modern Western nations that drives them to become involved in the affairs of other nations yet, when disaster results, makes them purblind to the consequences for which they are largely responsible.

Saturday, 8 November 2014

A Bridge Too Far

The Roman Catholic Bishops’ Synod

The Revolution that didn’t happen, and the Counter-Revolution that did

By J.C. von Krempach, J.D. 
October 24, 2014 
[A Bishops' Synod was recently held in Rome.  It considered the question of homosexuality.  The media was primed and ready.  Changes were afoot.  Or were they?  The outcome was quite different in the end.  What was going on?  J. C. von Krempach presents his thoughts.  Ed.]

This blog being sponsored by the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, the way in which the Catholic Church discusses issues related to marriage and the family cannot leave us indifferent. But even without C-Fam being our sponsor, we would have been following the Bishop’s Synod on the Family with a keen interest, given that the Catholic Church is today the most significant institution world-wide to continue defending the natural rights of the family. If the Catholic Church betrays the family, then the family will have no defenders anymore.

The Extraordinary Bishops’ Synod on the Family is now over, and the dust is slowly beginning to settle, although the true significance of the event will probably be understood only many years from now: it probably is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, and we still have to wait and see what follows between now and October 2015, when another Synod will meet in order to deal with the subject matter yet once again. Nevertheless, what we can say already now is that this was indeed an extraordinary event – a true turning point in history. The Church’s history is long enough to offer a precedent for nearly everything, but in this case I must say I don’t recall one.

Daily Devotional

Swine Trough Meetings

"I did know thee in the wilderness, in the land of great drought."
Hosea 13:5

Charles Spurgeon


Yes, Lord, thou didst indeed know me in my fallen state, and thou didst even then choose me for thyself. When I was loathsome and self-abhorred, thou didst receive me as thy child, and thou didst satisfy my craving wants. Blessed forever be thy name for this free, rich, abounding mercy.

Since then, my inward experience has often been a wilderness; but thou hast owned me still as thy beloved, and poured streams of love and grace into me to gladden me, and make me fruitful. Yea, when my outward circumstances have been at the worst, and I have wandered in a land of drought, thy sweet presence has solaced me. Men have not known me when scorn has awaited me, but thou hast known my soul in adversities, for no affliction dims the lustre of thy love.

Most gracious Lord, I magnify thee for all thy faithfulness to me in trying circumstances, and I deplore that I should at any time have forgotten thee and been exalted in heart, when I have owed all to thy gentleness and love. Have mercy upon thy servant in this thing!

Smoke, Mirrors, and Loopholes

Spying On One's Own

The UK government has finally come out of the closet.  It has reluctantly confirmed publicly, for the first time, that its intelligence agencies conduct warrant-less spying upon its own citizens.  But there is a casuistic justification which outdoes the subtlety of a Medieval Schoolman: the electronic data upon which the UK agencies spy has to have been collected by one of the other "Five Eyes" nations (Canada, the US, Australia, or New Zealand.)  This from The Guardian

Friday, 7 November 2014

Aw . . . Shucks

"Maybe You're Right"

Positivist Legal Systems Crumble Before Islamic Enclaves

Western countries long ago gave up the principle that all true law, and due respect for law, relies upon them being grounded in a higher power than the government.  In this sense, all Western law is now positivist law--law which is derived from human "bright ideas", derived from human experience and observation.    Often, when Western nations are confronted with people who reject "bright ideas" law outright and appeal to a higher power they do not know what to do.  They resemble the proverbial deer in the headlights.

Such is the tenor of the unease when the West is confronted with Islamic enclaves in their own countries who could not care less about Western law and its legal tradition.  The authorities shuffle their feet and don't know what to do.  In most Western countries more and more Islamic enclaves are self-governing according to their own traditions and laws.  The state authorities don't know what to do.

Denmark provides an example (as published in Jihad Watch).

Daily Devotional

Charity Towards God

C. S. Lewis


Some writers use the word charity to describe not only Christian love between human beings, but also God’s love for man and man’s love for God. About the second of these two, people are often worried. They are told they ought to love God. They cannot find any such feeling in themselves. What are they to do? The answer is the same as before. Act as if you did. Do not sit trying to manufacture feelings. Ask your- self, ‘If I were sure that I loved God, what would I do?’ When you have found the answer, go and do it.

On the whole, God’s love for us is a much safer subject to think about than our love for Him. Nobody can always have devout feelings: and even if we could, feelings are not what God principally cares about.

Christian Love, either towards God or towards man, is an affair of the will. If we are trying to do His will we are obeying the commandment, ‘Thou shalt love the Lord thy God.’ He will give us feelings of love if He pleases. We cannot create them for ourselves, and we must not demand them as a right. But the great thing to remember is that, though our feelings come and go, His love for us does not. It is not wearied by our sins, or our indifference; and, therefore, it is quite relentless in its determination that we shall be cured of those sins, at whatever cost to us, at whatever cost to Him.

From Mere Christianity
Compiled in A Year with C.S. Lewis
Mere Christianity. Copyright © 1952, C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. Copyright renewed © 1980, C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. Used with permission of HarperCollins Publishers. A Year With C.S. Lewis: Daily Readings from His Classic Works. Copyright © 2003 by C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. Used with permission of HarperCollins Publishers.  Sourced from BibleGateway.

Creepy Sanctimony

One of the Greats

"One of the most sanctimonious creeps of all time" would be a fair description of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, or J-JR for short.  But he is also one of the most celebrated intellectuals of the Modern period.  We need to understand why both assessments are fair and accurate.

First, the appellation of über-sanctimonious creep.

Paul Johnson, concluding his essay on J-JR, writes:
Rousseau's reputation during his lifetime, and his influence after his death, raise disturbing questions about human gullibility, and indeed about the human propensity to reject evidence it does not with to admit.  The acceptability of what Rousseau wrote depended in great part on his strident claim to be not merely virtuous but the most virtuous man of his time.

Why did not this claim collapse in ridicule and ignominy when his weaknesses and vices became not merely public knowledge but the subject of international debate?

Thursday, 6 November 2014

Douglas Wilson's Letter From Moscow

Do You Believe in Magic?

Douglas Wilson
Blog and Mablog
October 29, 2014

Okay, so it is a bit disturbing when the head transubstantiationist says that we need not believe in magic.
Now I grant that his subject was not the Lord’s Supper, but rather creation and evolution, but still. His subject was God’s relationship to the world, which is relevant in all things. We must keep in mind that the pontiff’s remarks were run through the interpretive grid of journalism, which has an enormous capacity to muddle things, but even so, we also have to admit that these comments, taken at face value, are what analytic logicians are wont to call a “dog’s breakfast.”

In their scramble to stay away from boo! words and phrases, respectable theologians can talk almost perfect nonsense about creation and intelligent design. “No, no, I am not a creationist. Well, yes, God did create everything . . .” “No, no, not intelligent design. All the designing occurred earlier.”

What it boils down to is that accomodationist Christians, who are in a state of low tension with the surrounding environment of unbelief, want to keep it that way. Low tension is the way to go, and you can still be in with the right crowd, you can still get invited to the right parties.

Daily Devotional

The Danger of Drifting

Therefore we must pay much closer attention to what we have heard, lest we drift away from it. (Hebrews 2:1)

John Piper


We all know people that this has happened to. There is no urgency. No vigilance. No focused listening or considering or fixing of their eyes on Jesus. And the result has not been a standing still, but a drifting away.  That is the point here: there is no standing still. The life of this world is not a lake. It is a river. And it is flowing downward to destruction. If you do not listen earnestly to Jesus and consider him daily and fix your eyes on him hourly, then you will not stand still, you will go backward. You will float by.

Drifting is a deadly thing in the Christian life. And the remedy to it, according to Hebrews 2:1, is, “Pay close attention to what you have heard.” That is, consider what God is saying in his Son Jesus. Fix your eyes on what God is saying and doing in the Son of God, Jesus Christ.

This is not a hard stroke to learn so that we can swim against the stream of sin and indifference. The only thing that keeps us from swimming like this is our sinful desire to float with other interests. 

But let us not complain that God has given us a hard job. Listen, consider, fix the eyes — this is not what you would call a hard job description. It is not a job description. It is a solemn invitation to be satisfied in Jesus so that we do not get lured downstream by deceitful desires.

If you are drifting today, one of the signs of hope that you are born again is that you feel pricked for this, and there is a rising desire in your heart to turn your eyes on Jesus and consider him and listen to him in the days and months and years to come.

For more about John Piper's ministry and writing, see DesiringGod.org.

Ideological Curios, Part III

The Spirit of Ahab still Lives

Israel is a divisive topic.  For many--particularly those on the Left, in the Commentariat, and amongst the chattering classes--it represents implacable evil, whilst Islamic Palestinians represent unimpeachable goodness.  For some Christians influenced by Dispensational biblical theology, Israel represents unimpeachable goodness, whilst those who oppose Israel--on any count--represent forces opposed to God.

Naturally, the world is neither that simple, nor binary. Christians run the risk of thinking in a binary fashion about the modern nation state of Israel when they read Biblical texts outside of the context of the "broad-brush" narrative of the Bible.

To cut to the chase, the modern nation state of Israel is not a fulfilment of biblical promises to the ancient Jewish people.  It is a creation of Britain, the United States, and the UN.  Is this a problem?  Not necessarily.  There have been plenty of such artificially created nations during the hey-day of imperialism, as well as before and after.

However, the artificiality of the origins of a nation should not be an argument to obliterate it.  In the end, nation states exist and should be reckoned with accordingly.

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

Contradicting Borg Assimilation

Christian Rapper Jackie Hill-Perry Comes Out 

Ex-homosexual Firebrand

Monday, October 27, 2014

Jackie Hill-Perry considers herself not merely an agent of change, but its embodiment as well.

A Christian spoken-word poet from Chicago, Ms. Hill-Perry professes to be a former lesbian — a change she ascribes to God.  God, she says, "not only changes your affections and your heart, but He gives you new affections that you didn't have." Now married to a Christian man, the 25-year-old poet is pregnant with the newlyweds' first child, which is due Dec. 13.  Her debut spoken-word album "The Art of Joy" will be released for free on Nov. 4 by Humble Beast record label.

Ms. Hill-Perry's experience runs counter to pronouncements by gay rights groups that exclaim sexuality as an inherent, immutable characteristic. What's more, her assertions come amid wide-ranging reports about the psychological dangers of so-called "reparative therapy," which aims to change the orientation of homosexuals.

But she remains steadfast in her belief that anything is possible with God as she meets criticism — and outright contempt — for speaking out about her experience. And thanks to her nearly 65,000 followers on social media, as well as encouragement from famed Baptist theologian John Piper, Ms. Hill-Perry's story has been far-reaching.

Daily Devotional

Liking and Loving

C. S. Lewis


Though Christian charity sounds a very cold thing to people whose heads are full of sentimentality, and though it is quite distinct from affection, yet it leads to affection. The difference between a Christian and a worldly man is not that the worldly man has only affections or ‘likings’ and the Christian has only ‘charity’.

The worldly man treats certain people kindly because he ‘likes’ them: the Christian, trying to treat every one kindly, finds himself liking more and more people as he goes on—including people he could not even have imagined him- self liking at the beginning.

This same spiritual law works terribly in the opposite direction. The Germans, perhaps, at first ill-treated the Jews because they hated them: afterwards they hated them much more because they had ill-treated them. The more cruel you are, the more you will hate; and the more you hate, the more cruel you will become — and so on in a vicious circle for ever.

Ideological Curios, Part II

Israel, Palestinians and the Secular Left

We lament any crass, nationalist idolatry which intones, "My country, right or wrong". But it seems as though, when it comes to Israel and the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, the world is filled with ideologues who have fallen into just such an idolatry.  Amongst these groups it is "My Israel, right or wrong" or "My Palestinians, right or wrong".  In both these cases, beneath the surface lies a controlling ideology which frames either Israel or the Palestinians as all good or all bad.

In a previous post we discussed the flawed biblical theology of Dispensationalism which leads professing Christians to side with Israel, right or wrong.  More accurately, they rarely see any wrongs when it comes to Israel.  Ironically, this highly motivated stream of Christians are acutely aware of the depravity and secularity of the West, including their respective host countries, but are blind toward the same failings and evil coursing through Israel's veins.

A similar, but reverse blindness can be found amongst the secular Left in the West.  Peter Hitchens, who for many years deliberately walked in the pathways of the Left, explains:

Tuesday, 4 November 2014

Douglas Wilson's Letter From Moscow

Something to Use, Something to Risk

Douglas Wilson
October 27, 2014
Blog and Mablog

I have written critically in the past about James Davison Hunter’s approach to not really changing the world. In the last analysis, his tag phrase “faithful presence” ought to be a means to victory, not a goal in itself. If we make it a goal, it is as though the coach settles for getting his team to just show up for the games, and the end result of that approach is what theologians used to call a “losing season.”

But my purpose here is not to dig through those old bones. One of the points that Hunter made very well, and which I appreciated very much, concerned the role of elite institutions in accomplishing whatever transformation might occur. Quite properly he leans against the idea that reformation is necessarily a grass roots “proletariat” sort of thing.

I actually think that the necessity of this kind of grass roots reformation is a bit of propaganda from the other team that we have bought into, and which has been greatly debilitating. In Rodney Stark’s book, The Rise of Christianity, he has a powerful chapter that demonstrates the explosive growth of Christianity was actually centered in the middle and upper classes of Roman society. The idea that Christianity grew so rapidly because it appealed to the downtrodden, the disenfranchised, the outcasts, and so on, was an idea that was floated early on by Friedrich Engels, and yes, that one, the Communist Manifesto guy.

Daily Devotional

Possible with God

“I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice.” (John 10:16)

John Piper


God has a people in every people group. He will call them with Creator power. And they will believe! What power is in these words for overcoming discouragement in the hard places of the frontiers!

The story of Peter Cameron Scott is a good illustration. Born in Glasgow in 1867, Scott became the founder of the Africa Inland Mission. But his beginnings in Africa were anything but auspicious.  His first trip to Africa ended in a severe attack of malaria that sent him home. He resolved to return after he recuperated.

This return was especially gratifying to him because this time his brother John joined him. But before long, John was struck down by fever.  All alone, Peter buried his brother and in the agony of those days recommitted himself to preach the gospel in Africa. Yet his health gave way again, and he had to return to England.

How would he ever pull out of the desolation and depression of those days?

Ideological Curios, Part I

Israel and the Dispensationalists

One of the great curios of our age is the ideology swirling around Israel and the Palestinians.  Amongst the chattering classes one can find those whose ideological position is that Israel is all bad, and the Palestinians all good.  Or the reverse can also be found: Palestinians all bad, Israel all good.  Neither position is anywhere near close to the truth.  In each and every case, the mutually contradictory positions fall out from a wider and deeper ideology.  It is the respective fundamental ideology which subsequently defines Israel or Palestine in certain ways.  If the ideology is aberrant, the views and positions taken on Israel and the Palestinians will be likewise aberrant and distorted.

The first aberrant ideology we will discuss is nestled within the Protestant churches--initially in non-conformist circles in the United Kingdom, but now particularly in the United States, but not exclusively so.  There is a school of biblical theology called Dispensationalism which interprets Old Testament prophecy in such a way that the Jewish people--who remain the chosen people of God--will return to the lands of ancient Israel and will rebuild the historical institutions of Judaism, namely the Temple and temple worship.

This return of the Jewish people to their ancient historical fastness is seen as a precursor to the eschatological return of Christ Himself, Who will then set up an earthly kingdom, with the present day Jerusalem as His seat of power.  This return of  Jews to the ancient land and the establishment of a nation-state is seen as a literal miracle, a spectacular fulfilment of biblical prophecy--something not seen ever since the restoration from Babylon in the fifth century BC.  The establishment of the nation state of Israel is seen as signifying the imminent return of Christ and the final eschatological battle of Armageddon.  This view happens to dovetail quite neatly with the ideology of secular Zionism, which sees the messianic promises of the Old Testament fulfilled in the modern nation state of Israel. 

Whilst this particular biblical theology of Dispensationalism has come under severe critique in the last forty years, leading many to reject it as contrary to the Scriptures, its influence lingers on in many churches.  Those who believe thus are naturally committed root and branch to the modern nation state of  Israel.  This particular biblical theology has been influential in the US Congress, leading many to support Israel through thick and thin--both materially and intellectually.  For the Dispensationalist, not to support Israel in this way would be tantamount to standing against the Lord Himself, risking eternal damnation. Much of the support for Israel amongst the conservative independents and the right-wing of the Republican party and the supporters of the Tea Party is influenced by latent Dispensational biblical theology.

Naturally, the secularists have few radar screens to detect religious or theological beliefs.  They interpret the "through thick and thin" support of Israel amongst the Right as unthinking idiocy and inveterate ignorance--which, they see, as typical of conservative and right wing folk in general. "They disagree with us and, therefore, are stupid and dumb."  (Consider the immediate "framing" of Sarah Palin when she came to national attention as an untutored rube, for example.  Palin is influenced by dispensational theology.)  Missing the theological and ideological rationale completely, the establishment Left see their pro-Israel conservative opponents as unthinking, irrational, and uneducated.  By so doing they rather confirm their own ignorance and the miasmic thickness of their own hide-bound cant.

Nevertheless, a repeated lacunae amongst Dispensational folk is their unwillingness to see Israel as it really is.  What this group will not see is that Israel is an irreligious nation by virtually every measure.  As Peter Hitchens observes:
. . . Israel is in almost all ways a secular state, founded by irreligious, socialist non-Jewish Jews and actively disliked as blasphemous by many of the most Orthodox Jews.  Its easily evaded marriage laws--one of the few religious things about its legal system--are misleadingly cited by critics as evidence that Israel is a theocracy, when it is nothing of the kind.  [Peter Hitchens, The Rage Against God: How Atheism Led Me to Faith (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010), p. 130.]
We recall meeting years ago with some very orthodox Jewish folk in Toronto who hated the nation state of Israel, believing it to be degenerately socialist, secular, and ungodly.  They would have nothing to do with it, and despite being immensely wealthy, refused to support the modern nation state of Israel financially or in any other way.  They, rather, devoted themselves to charitable work amongst the poor and dispossessed in Toronto--both Jew and Gentile alike.  That, they said, was the orthodox Jewish thing to do.

Thus, amongst the "Dispensationalists" and those influenced by their aberrant biblical theology, support for Israel is reflexive, unthinking and implacable.  Israel's promotion of homosexuality, abortion, sexual promiscuity, and every other evil--including the persecution of Christians in that land--are all overlooked and tolerated because of a deeper cause--namely, their belief in the imminent return of Christ to Israel and a false belief that the very existence of that nation is a spectacular fulfilment of biblical prophecy (as they see it).

The corollary is that the Dispensationalist Christians and those influenced by dispensationalist theology are likewise implacably opposed to Israel's enemies--the Palestinians, the Arabs, and the dispossessed.  To be fair, however, were these groups to accept the existence of Israel as a given and work to co-exist in peace, they would rejoice and do all that they could to assist the very same Palestinians and Arabs. (Dispensationalists, like most Christians, tend to be very generous.)

Remove the false under-girding theology of Dispensationalism, and its attendant pro-Israel ideology and one is left looking at Israel as it really is: a secular, pagan, Unbelieving, socialist, irreligious modern democratic state, replete with every kind of vice and iniquity.  Sort of like New Zealand, or Australia, or Canada, or . . .

The second aberrant ideology which controls attitudes to Israel--in this case, hostility--is the European (and increasingly US) secular Left.  We will canvass the ideological grounds of their implacable hostility toward Israel and their reflexive support for Palestinians and Islamism next.

Monday, 3 November 2014

Just So Stories

Islamic Casuistry

The cognitive dissonance in the West at ISIS atrocities is as much a scandal in some ways as the atrocities themselves.  We have grown used to justifications and defences for Islamic violence put forth by Western  politicians yet they remain scandalous.  The Western Commentariat insists upon framing the violence of Islamic jihadis in Marxist terms and categories.  People there are poor.  They are oppressed.  The only way to purify themselves is by bloodshed and brutal violence.  Such self-willed blindness is sickening in every way. 

In a world dominated by ideologies of materialism and secularism, religious motivations fail to compute.  The effectual and actual cause of all things is matter--which loosely translates into money and the lack of it.  Poverty is the root cause of violence in the Middle East, Syria and Iraq, don't you know.  Rarely has the world been treated to such condescension and arrogance on the part of its political leaders and attendant Commentariat.

Recording the violence is gaining air-time in the West.  The West's justification and apologia for the violence is also getting air-time.  (It's not really Islamic, don't you know.)  What is getting shut down is the Islamic justification and rationale.  They do not fit the West's self-imposed "hear no evil, see no evil" ideology.

Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, born Ibrahim ibn Awwad ibn Ibrahim ibn Ali ibn Muhammad al-Badri al-Samarrai is the proclaimed Caliph of the Islamic State.  By now it should be evident to all that he is no dummy.  He is not an ignorant, illiterate boof.  He has a doctorate in Islamic studies.  ISIS is offering a religious justification for its treatment of captured innocents, based upon the Koran and the Hadith.  It's just that it is inconvenient for the West to take that justification seriously.  It might offend some Muslims.  Hence the tortuous contortions on the part of Western politicians to find Western reasons that fit in with the secularist religion of the West.

Daniel Pipes, a student of Islamic doctrine and ideology, presents the ISIS case:

Daily Devotional

Daily Devotional

"We are all as an unclean thing."
Isaiah 64:6

Charles Spurgeon


The believer is a new creature, he belongs to a holy generation and a peculiar people--the Spirit of God is in him, and in all respects he is far removed from the natural man; but for all that the Christian is a sinner still. He is so from the imperfection of his nature, and will continue so to the end of his earthly life. The black fingers of sin leave smuts upon our fairest robes.

Sin mars our repentance, ere the great Potter has finished it, upon the wheel. Selfishness defiles our tears, and unbelief tampers with our faith. The best thing we ever did apart from the merit of Jesus only swelled the number of our sins; for when we have been most pure in our own sight, yet, like the heavens, we are not pure in God's sight; and as he charged his angels with folly, much more must he charge us with it, even in our most angelic frames of mind.

The song which thrills to heaven, and seeks to emulate seraphic strains, hath human discords in it.

Dirty Money

Ten Kilometre Chain Gangs

An unexpected outcome of secularism taking control of our society is lots of belly laughter.  There is  no shortage of material to lampoon and ridicule. 

One inanity which has generated a great deal of raucous mirth over the years has been "private-public partnerships" or "public-private partnerships" (depending on whether you are representing the gummint or the people).  These partnerships have come into vogue in a few western countries in recent years as the socialists running things have realised money was running out.  Faced with electorally disastrous options, they have scrambled to find new sources of capital.  Cutting spending was the least palatable option--elections are won or lost on the weight of bribes offered.  More borrowing was an equally hazardous route.  Rising borrowing levels and printing money risk taking countries to the brink of credit downgrades which have lots of bad consequences for voters. 

It was Margaret Thatcher who tartly observed that socialists eventually run out of other people's money.  And so it is coming to pass.  But wait--what about public-private partnerships, or "PPP" for short, or if you are way cool, "P3"?

Saturday, 1 November 2014

Letter From America (About Ground Zero in Liberia)


"We Rest on Thee and In Thy Name We Go"

He’s Risking His Own Well-Being to Battle Ebola: Humanitarian Leader Reveals Why He’s on the Ground in Liberia




With the dire Ebola outbreak continuing to rage, countless missionaries and humanitarian aid workers are risking their lives abroad in an effort to try and stop the virus in its tracks.  Among those humanitarian leaders is David Darg, the vice-president of international operations for Operation Blessing, a Christian charity known for taking aid and resources to dangerous areas across the globe.

Darg, who recently told TheBlaze about his organization’s work to train Liberian churches and distribute liquid chlorine, said in a follow-up interview Wednesday that the situation in Monrovia, Liberia, where he is stationed is “really intense.”

“It’s one of the most intense missions I’ve been on in years, because you’re constantly on guard,” he said.

Daily Devotional

Men in White Collars

The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid “dens of crime” that Dickens loved to paint. It is not done even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice.

From The Screwtape Letters
Compiled in A Year with C.S. Lewis
The Screwtape Letters. Copyright © 1942, C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. Copyright restored © 1996 C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. Used with permission of HarperCollins Publishers. A Year With C.S. Lewis: Daily Readings from His Classic Works. Copyright © 2003 by C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. Used with permission of HarperCollins Publishers.  Sourced from BibleGateway.

Towards A Second Christendom

Diet of Worms, Part Deux

Self-conscious Protestants celebrate October 31st as Reformation Day.  It was on that day in 1517, an Augustinian friar, Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the door of the castle church at Wittenberg.  (This was the normal "broadsheet" technique to announce a forthcoming public debate.)  These days, the celebrations of Reformation Day usually consist of conferences, lectures, and sermons remembering and giving thanks to God for the Reformation.

We blogged yesterday on how the Reformation signalled the end to Christendom.  Luther said his conscience must be bound primarily to the Word of God; his opponents said that were this principle to be taken seriously it would mean the end of Christendom.

Historian, Mark Noll, whose essay we were referring to in our piece, concluded that both Luther and the church authorities were right.